SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: queenleah who wrote (1535)10/10/2007 8:14:55 PM
From: InvesTingRead Replies (3) of 2121
 
Odd how Queen went so far to intimate that Brinker might have been telling the truth for the reason he cancelled James' subscription--that he had leaked information.

James said he called and no one would explain what he had "leaked" . James said he was unaware of any such leak in his posts and since they are all public it is very telling that to this instant "NOONE" (that's bob Brinker as Don Lane in a hissy fit lingo Queen no need for a Sic) has posted one thing from James that would be a leak justifying Brinker's action.

James rightly guessed that the thin skinned Brinker might have been miffed at some of his comments concerning the buck nekkid emperor. And Queen seemed to claim that was a failed argument.

Yet it seems Octavian comes to the same conclusion....ie that Brinker was simply poed at the substance of James posts (and imo the comment that he was not going to subscribe again) and cancelled his few remaining newsletters out of spite.

Oddly Queen agrees with Octavian and says "so what"?

Ya just can't make this stuff up. LOL

" octavian said "And the only reason I can think of that a basher would subscribe, is to find little things to nit-pick and criticize. So a cancelled subscription should not be a big deal."

Agreed. From all I've read, it appears that James himself professed not to care that much about the Marketimer cancellation, but others are using it as another excuse for ever-ongoing bashing. "

So Queen agrees with Octavian that Brinker's vendetta against James was because in Octavian and Queens world that James was a "basher"--a more enlightened view is that over time the scales fell off of James' eyes and he came to understand what Bob Brinker was really all about.

Geez getting the logical truth out of some of you is worse than pulling teeth.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News