SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (224086)10/14/2007 1:20:55 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Read Replies (1) of 793611
 
It is sad if seats on the Supreme Court are thought to be belonging to different groups. The justices should represent the constitution. Sadly that is likely an ideal whose time is past. I saw Clarence Thomas's appointment as a way to get a conservative voice on the court that would be difficult to "Bork". Clarence Thomas was not a nominee seat reserved for a minority or any other group.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News