SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lifeisgood who wrote (1618)10/15/2007 7:28:29 PM
From: octavianRead Replies (1) of 2121
 
--Right. If we are going to "correct" other posters, we should name names and post numbers, imo. Otherwise, no one knows who we are talking about, or whether the original poster was actually wrong, or if maybe you misread the original comment that you are "correcting."

lifeisgood responded:

<<I am not here to correct other posters.>>

--LOL. You already DID "correct" someone. You just didn't tell us who, or which post. I have a strong hunch you were WRONG in your "correction," but in typical basher style you will do anything rather than admit you were wrong.


<<As far as a stop loss goes, you either have one or you don't. Mine are all triggered by the action of the stock, not by my mood or whether I'm actually on the computer.>>

--OK. That's a good point. Many people may have been stopped out automatically. But I'm sure many others, like my friend, just waited for it to go below $84 at the close, intending to sell the next day.

<< When Brinker's stop loss hit on his first QQQQ trade, many Brinker followers sold at a loss.>>

--I don't think that is true. I'm quite sure they broke about even.

It would have been good if they HAD lost. Maybe that would have kept them out of the second one!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext