The New (Profitable) Ramtron Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New (Profitable) Ramtron

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: poster1234 who wrote (60)	10/16/2007 6:24:41 AM
From: sleupendriewer	Read Replies (1) of 647

imo there is no issue with the 200k write cycles (for powerdown) - an issue might be the external cap in the uF-range afaik. furtheron there might be an argumtation-chain that TI claims that sram (in embedded systems) is more expensive than fram - when I take a look at SONOS I would assume that this dosn't make the nvsram-cells "cheaper" than sram - I would go in the opposite direction - so I would "bet" that fram should be "cheaper" (in production) than nvsram ...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next