Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (224467)	10/17/2007 3:53:26 AM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) of 793964

You mean you think we take on a piss ant broken country like Iraq with the biggest and mightiest military the world has ever seen and we haven't accomplished anything? Exactly!! Boy do you make the case for my point. I don't think so. Your point is that more money is not needed. My point is our armed forces need to be more effective. Like Clinton and the rest of the current crop of demos you argue daily that we can do more with less military. And like them you fail to put forth one solid new solution...not even an idea. We are the only country in the world today with substantial expeditionary land warfare forces deployed 8,000 miles from home with significant naval and air force assets deployed in force protection and mission support roles. What do you use for your comparisons and apparent esoteric arguments that the cost is too high. So far when challenged you use words like stupid to counter. That is childish. Give us some meat. How much should we spend on defense? How should we spend it? How big or small should our army be? Where should it be deployed? C'mon counselor. So far you have been whining and complaining. How about taking some risk and offering a solution.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next