I saw the responses to your post and noted that they somehow fixated on the 'small picture' date of your reply to a singular msg. Not surprising for this board that somewhere, the overall bigger picture more in your text may have gotten lost. And indeed moments afterward, you had a guy wanting to define "A BULL's Board Comment..." Probably shoulda just said, "Oh yeah, despite bankruptcy and fraud, it's still going to The Moon." I think that's the comment he was looking for.
Do ya think, on SI, these segregated "Bulls Board" thingies are a good idea for the clientele that acually "invests"? They seem pretty much an intellectual 10 minutes away from Raging Bull ... and I guess that bridge is IHub .... somewhat 5 minutes away which is perhaps closer than four blondes in a Volkswagen trying to make investment decisions ... Fahrfrumthinken.
But hey, ...LoL .."Is that a Bulls Board" comment? as he asked. Oh yeah, let's think and analyse the point where JMHollen got them to, yet again .... <pffffft> ---- Ahh... as John Gotti may have remarked: "Dey got what's comin' to them."
How's that for "Bulls Board" comment, if one must define what a cheerleader's cheer oughta be. Might they try investing for real sometime ..... you know... reading annual reports, figuring quarterly cash flow. The usual.
And if Donpat asks "uh, is that a 'Bulls Board' comment?" Well, DP, no it's not. You got DP'ed by your own wherewithal ... or perhaps, wherewith-not ... and Hollen, too. <g> Sweet, yes? <vbg> |
