SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill10/18/2007 11:55:23 AM
   of 793975
 
Stop Screening
CAFE HAYEK
By Russell Roberts on Terrorism

The data are in:

"Security screeners at two of the nation's busiest airports failed to find fake bombs hidden on undercover agents posing as passengers in more than 60% of tests last year, according to a classified report obtained by USA TODAY.

Screeners at Los Angeles International Airport missed about 75% of simulated explosives and bomb parts that Transportation Security Administration testers hid under their clothes or in carry-on bags at checkpoints, the TSA report shows."

I'm not really thrilled that this info is going public, but I suspect would-be terrorists already know this. The bottom line--we are spending millions of dollars worth of travel time and TSA employee time for nothing. It's a sham. Instead of having incredibly expensive machines to x-ray our luggage and incredibly expensive people standing around and pawing my underwear and incredibly expensive lost time from waiting in line and instead of losing all the foregone benefits from travel that doesn't take place because the TSA has made it so unpleasant, let's just say a magic spell or put on a lucky shirt when we travel. True, it won't really make us safer, but NEITHER DOES THE CURRENT SYSTEM.

But there is a bright spot, sort of:

"San Francisco International Airport screeners, who work for a private company instead of the TSA, missed about 20% of the bombs, the report shows."

So they're roughly three times more conscientious about their job than the government employees, confirming the virtues of privatization, yes. But 20%? For me, even that "low" number makes the costs unlikely to exceed the benefits.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext