SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 378.38+2.7%Nov 10 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Archie Meeties who wrote (24359)10/22/2007 4:29:51 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) of 217662
 
i believe at all levels china does not believe it can effectively influence any other nation in any permanent way as long as a substantial number of locals do not wish to be influenced, and so chinese not keen on intervention in most cases unless a dire national imperative calls for intervention

when china did intervene, it did so invariably in a big and committed way over as-long-as-it-takes elapsed time, until immediate objectives reached, even if such undertaking requires 55 years, in the case of n.korea, and 35+ years in the matter of indo-china, and then stop, and stop fast

intervention is against nature, only to be used in response to other intervention

intervention generally brings on the worst of all unintended possible consequences, whether immediately or at a later date

for the usa, 9.11 can be traced directly to past interventions, same for saddam, same for iran, etc etc etc, and soon enough we will most assuredly see the down side of intervening in pakistan, the worst of all possible consequences can already be guessed at, and is most definitely still to happen
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext