SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Amark$p who wrote (51579)10/29/2007 2:55:34 AM
From: jackjc  Read Replies (3) of 78419
 
Thanks, he is consistent in his outlook. I keep cash in 100% US Treas also.

But I see the derivative thing as a giant poker game, one parties
loss is offset by the other parties gain. The game is zero sum and
can't go broke. With huge leverage obviously a big interest rate move
(80% are int rate contracts) would BK plenty of counterparties.

So new name on the Corp/Fund/Bank door. Some lessons learned, fear
bringing some types of business to a crawl while sorted out.

And the worst thing is the months it would take to determine status.

My point is don't just look at one side and the unbelievable losses.
They can't and would not be paid in full, just cancelled out IMO.

Just as the losses can't be paid in full, so also the gains would not accrue.

Like a high stakes poker game played on credit instead of cash
in full on the table. The huge losses never happen, nor the gains.

Don't know why no one ever sees it this way but that is my take.

All I ever see is the hundreds of trillions in possible losses, ain't gonna happen.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext