<<China can hurt the US through dumping their dollar assets or engaging in a trade war. The problem for China is that they would be hurting themselves tremendously if they did that>>
... China is benefiting by not dumping dollars. China has no reason to dump dollars. China has a 600 years pent-up demand for stuff dollars can bring, as in infrastructure, mines, oil and gas fields, homes, power stations, satellites, anti-satellites, etc etc etc. China has no reason to hurt the dollar ... not yet.
<<It like pulling a hand grenade in a fist fight, effective in a certain sense, but you probably won't like the results>>
At some juncture, the dollar will wobble relative to Yuan, and when so, so be it, nothing to like or dislike, only something to take advantage of.
You read too much into my posts.
As to ... <<in the mean time, while the criminals in China are being rounded up to be satisfyingly and specially rendered
Are you happy about that?>>
... Nothing to be happy or unhappy about. Some mind-alerting acts are done to warn others not to put lead in paint and such paint on toys that kids might play with. Worth a try, if it works, great, and if not, try something else.
You again read too much into my posts.
<<the officialdom in your part continue to use the most modern of offensive weaponry in the most savage manner to kill the most defenseless and absolutely innocent teenagers
Innocent teenagers? More like violent militia members and terrorists. Not that innocent teenagers don't get killed. Innocents get killed in war. But most of the killing of innocents is coming from the other side, who often deliberately targets them>>
A few details, them folks live in their own country and belong there, and they, in the aggregate, wish to engage in war, and so it is their aggregate choice.
Your soldiers are invaders, comma, and are engaging in war crimes, semi colon; and such acts are done in yourn name and paid for by you using money borrowed in your name, full stop.
Another detail - your central borrowing banker Maestro Greensputin unambiguously stated that your invasion was about oil, and nothing more.
1.5 million armenians got slaughtered by the enabling of turks of the ottoman empire, and such is labelled by your representatives as genocide.
Now, how many hundreds of thousands (try one million as a round number) got slaughtered in Iraq, where your elected officialdom states that it harboured no more than a few thousand dead-ender terrorists?
So, the rest must necessarily be innocents, and/or thugs enabled by your direct electoral action, and as the numbers are approaching the magic number of 1.5 million, what should we conclude that would be in alignment of the hypocritical action of your chosen representatives?
In the mean time, Message 24008823
Chugs, TJ |
