"States are viable or not based on the choices of their leaders and their people. Tiny states with no resources to speak of, like Israel and Singapore, are more than viable, are prosperous, because of their choices."
Have you forgotten the massive support that Israel receives every year? Singapore doesn't get any support.
Neither Israel nor Singapore would be viable if they were balkanized as the Camp David and Taba proposals offered the Palestinians. That's why Israel has expanded its borders, the original borders did not allow for a viable Israeli state.
"No peace will ever result in a "viable" Palestine, and that's because no viable state could ever exist given the Palestinian leadership. You could hand them all of Israel, heck, you could hand them all of North America, and they would turn it all into a larger version of Gaza."
Utter nonsense, there is no way that you can predict the future of a Palestinian state with any accuracy. Your claim is a typical AC claim, no source(none exist), no basis in fact(no viable Palestinian state has ever existed), and based on bigotry(which is obvious to the meanest intelligence). |
