SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marcos who wrote (51797)11/2/2007 10:39:56 AM
From: loantech  Read Replies (1) of 78424
 
KTN ON THE MOVE:KTN - V 0.3 1.29 · 1.30 5.5 1.29 +0.06 +4.9 %

Marcos please review the following. May contain many errors. <G>

Results pending for Promontorio. It only took 26 drill holes to produce this 1973 non 43-101 compliant resource:

A feasibility study was prepared in 1973, with an ore reserve estimated at 384,000 metric tons grading 0.12% Cu, 2.80% Pb, 1.74%, Zn, 367 g/t Ag and 1.5 g/t Au, to a depth of 100 m below the floor of the open cut.--------

I just did a back of the envelope calculation on silver gram per ton equivalent and about knocked myself off the chair!

This is a rough number based upon this mornings metals prices and using 2204 lbs per ton.

Those 26 drill holes must have averaged 799 grams per ton silver equivalent to forecast the reserve estimate.

The video I linked earlier says that those drill holes averaged up to 20 meters of 1000 + gram per ton silver.

Marcos I am counting on you to tell us what is wrong with this picture and my math.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext