SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: paunch13 who wrote (11269)11/6/2007 9:18:21 PM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (1) of 11603
 
from paunch13 "... if you can get Dick to post on SI and say
that he refuses to give out any information then that will do"

John,

The fact that Maxam has NOT alerted shareholders via press releases to the status of activity
cited in the March and April of 2006 press releases equates to the equivalent of:

"Maxam refuses to give out any information."

Once again, because of Maxam's refusal to inform shareholders.

1. Maxam does not want shareholders to know the details of Maxam's activity for past 18 months.
2. This causes a normal speculation of incompetence or criminal activity.
3. If Maxam and/or Xcentia obtains the values mentioned within 2006
press releases of March and April, and value of common shares held by
shareholders of today are substantially diluted in value, legal action
is required to investigate during the discovery process to determine fraud.

Those that advise shareholders that valid information of Maxam's activity
can be obtain through a telephone call or e-mail contact to Richard Steeves,
President of Maxam Gold, rather than obtain such from the official web site
of maxamgoldcorp.com may have a hidden agenda to prevent
the shareholders of Maxam from knowing current and past activity.

In my opinion, until shareholders and potential investors into Maxam know
the state of this company, then the value of common shares held today
could become worthless, or near so in the future.

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News