re: "You are taking the post of someone [without] any proof"
"... talking about something that Xcentia was suppose to do,
... that has never been done and [has] nothing to do with [Maxam Gold Corp.]
... post who that person is and I will check him out..."
John,
If it has nothing to do with Maxam, why was it described by Maxam:
Welcome to the Maxam Gold Corporation Website.
Press Release Apr 3, 2006 maxamgoldcorp.com
Press Release Mar 20, 2006 maxamgoldcorp.com
Press Release Mar 8, 2006 maxamgoldcorp.com
Press Release Mar 7, 2006 maxamgoldcorp.com
Press Release Mar 6, 2006 maxamgoldcorp.com
Your request: "post who that person is"
The following 4 posts are the source of this person.
______________________________________________________________
(1.)
11/6/2007 9:18:21 PM [From: d:oug, To: paunch13]
Message 24031797
re: from paunch13 "... if you can get Dick to post on SI and say
that he refuses to give out any information then that will do"
John,
That Maxam has NOT alerted shareholders via press releases to the status of
activity cited in March and April of 2006 press releases equates to:
"Maxam refuses to give out any information."
Once again, because of Maxam's refusal to inform shareholders.
1. Maxam does not want shareholders to know details of activity for past 18 months.
2. This causes a normal speculation of incompetence or criminal activity.
3. If Maxam and/or Xcentia obtains the values mentioned within 2006
press releases of March and April, and value of common shares held by
shareholders of today are substantially diluted in value, legal action
is required to investigate during the discovery process to determine fraud.
Those that advise shareholders that valid information of Maxam's activity
can be obtain through a telephone call or e-mail contact to Richard Steeves,
President of Maxam Gold, rather than obtain such from the official web site
of maxamgoldcorp.com may have a hidden agenda to prevent
the shareholders of Maxam from knowing current and past activity.
In my opinion, until shareholders and potential investors into Maxam know
the state of this company, then the value of common shares held today
could become worthless, or near so in the future.
Doug
_____________________________________________________________
(2.)
11/6/2007 2:09:13 PM [From: d:oug, To: paunch13]
Message 24030475
re: "...your post and has nothing to do with Mxam"
John, I copied & pasted it below, its ALL about MXAM.
If need been, I'll itemize each part and expand on them to help you understand.
From: d:oug
To: paunch13
"...have always found Dick to be truthful"
Maxam Gold's President will not alert shareholders via press releases
the status of activity cited in those of March and April of 2006
that contain activity to determine if Maxam is worthless or not.
Such that officers of Maxam do not want shareholders to know details
of how they have run Maxam with for the past 18 months generates
a strong speculation of a cover-up of incompetence or criminal activity.
If Maxam and/or Xcentia obtains the values mentioned within 2006
press releases of March and April, and value of common shares held by
shareholders of today are substantially diluted in value, legal action
is required to investigate during the discovery process to determine fraud.
Those that advise shareholders that valid information of Maxam's activity
can be obtain through a telephone call or e-mail contact to Richard Steeves,
President of Maxam Gold, rather than obtain such from the official web site
of maxamgoldcorp.com may have a hidden agenda to prevent
the shareholders of Maxam from knowing current and past activity.
In my opinion, until shareholders and potential investors into Maxam know
the state of this company, then the value of common shares held today
could become worthless, or near so in the future.
Doug
______________________________________________________________
(3.)
11/5/2007 1:53:31 PM [From: d:oug, To: paunch13]
Message 24027193
re: "...have always found Dick to be truthful"
Maxam Gold's President will not alert shareholders via press releases
the status of activity cited in those of March and April of 2006
that contain activity to determine if Maxam is worthless or not.
Such that officers of Maxam do not want shareholders to know details
of how they have run Maxam with for the past 18 months generates
a strong speculation of a cover-up of incompetence or criminal activity.
If Maxam and/or Xcentia obtains the values mentioned within 2006
press releases of March and April, and value of common shares held by
shareholders of today are substantially diluted in value, legal action
is required to investigate during the discovery process to determine fraud.
Those that advise shareholders that valid information of Maxam's activity
can be obtain through a telephone call or e-mail contact to Richard Steeves,
President of Maxam Gold, rather than obtain such from the official web site
of maxamgoldcorp.com may have a hidden agenda to prevent
the shareholders of Maxam from knowing current and past activity.
In my opinion, until shareholders and potential investors into Maxam know
the state of this company, then the value of common shares held today
could become worthless, or near so in the future.
Doug
______________________________________________________________
(4.)
10/31/2007 6:18:18 PM [From: d:oug, To: DESERTDIRT]
Message 24015084
re: "Why don't you send an E-Mail to Maxam for info on Xcentia"
The answer is clearly simple:
1. It is a worthless collect of data.
2. Allows Maxam to give out un-official "feel-good" status.
3. The "feel-good" info is posted here as if Maxam spoke it.
This type of activity is a ploy by Maxam to satisfy a desire by shareholders
to know about Maxam, but history these past twenty (20) years demostrate it
to be mushroom feed (keep them in the dark & feed them dung).
The September 2007 Maxam press release has no updated information on the prior
two press releases in March and April of 2006 that contained substantial and very
important activity to determine if Maxam is worthless to shareholders, or not.
It can be speculated that the September 2007 press release came only because
a few shareholders sent money to Maxam to generate an ore report that did not,
and would not exist. This type of opinion implies that something very wrong is with
Maxam Gold, such that the officers of Maxam do not want shareholders to know
the activity they have run Maxam with for the past 18 months. Speculation on
the purpose of the new money to conduct ore testing can also generate an opinion
that this new money could be a pump-and-dump attempt by these folks to rescue
the money they put in MXAM shares in the past, for it has been facts of history
like the Bre-X scandal where the tested ore was salted to show good results.
Its does seem clean and less of speculation that something is very wrong here
for Maxam to refuse to update the news releases of March and April of 2006,
and only put out a news release void of updated status of the prior two because
of the new money sent to them to generate an unscheduled ore test.
As to the claims that Maxam didn't have the cash to further or complete prior
ore testing or research on the fly ash process, if true does not account for
Maxam's unwilling to put out a news release stating such with options that could
generate cash for Maxam to complete promising activity to generate revenue.
Nope, the silence speaks of a cover-up of incompetence or criminal activity.
Its possible the officers of Maxam could sabotage the ore testing now started
if their agenda these 18 months has been to cause Maxam to fail into bankrupcy
so that a plan to take ownership of Maxam and its wealth is criminally executed.
Once again, new money is on a "Fools Errand" since it knows not the status of:
Press releases of March and April of 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Update on the commercialization of the Xcentia/Maxam process.
... became fully operational on November 30, 2005
... successful extraction test sequences on representative coal ash samples
... two interested companies (1) U.S. metals producer (2) U.S. power producer
... next phase [a] similar test program for gold ore and precious metal samples
provided by mining companies interested in using the process
... Maxam's selection of Xcentia Mining LLC and Xcentia Energy LLC as a partner
in the mining and coal ash process commercialization
... Maxam finalized its agreements with Xcentia Mining LLC and Xcentia Energy LLC
... Maxam provides its extraction process technology in exchange for a 21% equity
interest in Xcentia Mining LLC and a 10% equity interest in Xcentia Energy LLC.
Xcentia Mining LLC specifically agrees that Maxam will be granted license, free use
of this technology, together with any future improvements made by Xcentia
... the success of Maxam's extraction process technology are the steps towards
creating a multi-revenue opportunity. Maxam is well positioned to substantially
benefit from Xcentia's commercialization of Maxam's extraction process.
... a progress report on current and planned extraction process patent activity.
... the original Maxam extraction process patent application was reworked
and resubmitted to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has accepted the revised application
and patent issuance is pending.
... working with the original Maxam extraction technology Xcentia has identified
two additional areas that qualify for additional patents. One patent application
has been submitted and the other is in final review.
... will perform gold ore extraction tests on its inventory of gold ore samples.
Once current tests are complete, the Maxam ore tests can begin.
Doug
-end- |
