SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (358325)11/13/2007 7:53:40 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) of 1577760
 
... then you'd be raising the future liability of SS for those who paid more.

Unless you want to cap their benefits,


Do you know anything about this program? Benefits are capped.

why not make SS a true "welfare for the elderly" program?
A


I don't know anybody that is talking about "welfare for the elderly" except you. It's prety weird.

This is a perfect example of FUD spread by those who fear any change to SS.

The CBO?

The debt already takes into account the fact that the SS "surplus" is being looted every year. Diverting some of the SS tax toward private accounts just means that there will be less looting going on, but the rate at which the debt increases doesn't change.

You really don't know what the F you are talking about. Go back and look at the numbers from the Bush plan. Scary shit.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext