SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kirk © who wrote (1800)11/15/2007 2:10:27 AM
From: Math JunkieRead Replies (1) of 2121
 
I could ask you to calculate into Brinker's record the large percentage one of his former subscribers told me he lost holding Lucent all the way down from $60 to $2 because of a decade of Brinker saying how great Lucent was on the radio and how much he made on the stock since it's IPO at $6 and change.... but I won't since that was not a recommendation bought with cash reserves that his subscribers were told to "keep liquid" in money funds (not GNMAs) so they could act quickly when told.

This is the first time I have ever seen you claim that an "off the books" recommendation should be ignored because he didn't tell people where to raise the cash. It seems awfully convenient. Can you point to any examples where you made that argument before the QQQQ argument came up? For example, did you ever argue that UTEK should be ignored for that reason, or STII?

Whether he told people where to raise the cash or not is irrelevant. If one were to try to construct a record based on his radio recommendations, then any Lucent buy recommendations should be factored into it.

If a newsletter writer writes his letter in such a way as to tell half to stay in cash and half to buy a high beta security such as QQQQ, then is he honest to report ONLY the favorable results?

For the zillionth time, HE SHOULD BE REPORTING BOTH!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext