This is a perfect example of why ADVR will not rocket in the short term.
  Amgen's New Drug Faces Risks               Inherent in the Biotech Market
                By RHONDA L. RUNDLE                Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
                THOUSAND OAKS, Calif. -- Amgen Inc. has finally               received approval for its first new drug in six years, a               treatment for chronic hepatitis C. But it still faces the plight               of so many biotech companies: Trying to generate new               products and new growth, while grappling with killer               competition and deep cutbacks in health-care costs.
                Amgen announced Tuesday that the Food and Drug               Administration has approved Infergen, a drug aimed at a               hard-to-treat blood-borne virus that causes liver injury               over a period of years. Four times more common than               HIV, hepatitis C kills 8,000 to 10,000 Americans annually.
                Amgen hopes Infergen will help patients who haven't               responded well to other hepatitis C drugs, or who have               suffered relapses. But it's a niche drug that analysts say will               be lucky to eventually generate $100 million annually in               U.S. sales.
                That's a far cry from Amgen's other two drugs: Epogen, an               anemia drug for kidney-dialysis patients that was               introduced in 1989, and Neupogen, which was introduced               two years later and helps cancer chemotherapy patients               fight infections. Each of these drugs generated more than               $1 billion in sales last year.
                But Neupogen faces mounting pressure from health plans               trying to hold down drug costs. And in August, Amgen               abruptly withdrew its endorsement of analysts' 1997               earnings projections, citing an unexpected slowdown in               Epogen sales. Uncertainty about how serious the Epogen               problems may be, and the absence of exciting research               results this year, have pushed Amgen's shares into the               doldrums.
                A special Medicare program that pays for most dialysis               treatments accounts for the bulk of Epogen sales. Now the               drug has fallen into the crosshairs of Medicare cost-cutters:               The Health Care Financing Administration, which oversees               Medicare, is currently reviewing a proposal to cut Epogen               payments by 10%.
                Amgen stock rose 46.8 cents to $49.6315 Wednesday in               Nasdaq Stock Market trading.
                Infergen's debut "will be a great test for Amgen," because               the drug faces competition from established rivals, says               Douglas S. Perry, who as Amgen's marketing director is in               charge of the Infergen launch. With a few possible               exceptions, drugs in Amgen's development pipeline will               also face competition.
                By contrast, Epogen and Neupogen were almost instant               blockbusters that broke new medical ground. Infergen,               however, will be up against two similar drugs sold by               pharmaceutical powerhouses. Schering-Plough Corp., the               leading hepatitis C drug maker, filed a lawsuit last               December charging Amgen with infringement of a patent               held by Biogen Inc., which discovered the drug Schering               sells as Intron A. Amgen says it has a different molecule               that doesn't infringe on Biogen's patent.
                Infergen is the first of five drugs that Amgen expects to               commercialize over the next five years, says Gordon               Binder, chairman and chief executive officer. Stemgen, a               blood-cell booster for breast-cancer chemotherapy               patients, could receive FDA approval next year, he says.               Analysts estimate modest sales at maturity of up to $50               million a year. When Amgen went searching for a               seasoned pharmaceutical marketing executive 18 months               ago, Mr. Perry fit the bill. During 23 years at what is now               Germany's Hoechst Marion Roussel, "every product I was               involved in came up against major competition," he says.               At Amgen he has assembled a sales team of about 50               people who will promote Infergen directly to hepatologists               and gastroenterologists who treat hepatitis C patients.               Amgen is pricing the drug at $2,116 for a 24-week               treatment, slightly higher than Intron A.
                The team's mission won't be easy because Infergen doesn't               have a clear edge over either Intron A or Roche Holding               Ltd.'s Roferon A. Scientists who designed Infergen initially               hoped it would have fewer side effects than rival drugs, but               they were disappointed.
                "It's not a pleasant experience to take any of the               interferons," which all cause flu-like symptoms, Mr. Perry               concedes. Picking his words carefully, he says: "Infergen is               just as good as the other compounds" and offers "a second               chance for those who have failed" on the other drugs.
                Amgen hopes to attract some of the 70% of hepatitis C               patients who haven't benefited from rival drugs, or who               relapsed after taking them. In addition, Amgen expects               more infected people to seek treatment as they learn that               the disease can lead to cirrhosis, liver cancer or death. Of               the estimated four million infected Americans, only about               10% have been diagnosed.
                Schering's Intron A, which is used to treat several other               conditions besides hepatitis C, produced sales of $160               million in the U.S. last year. Just as it was planning               Infergen's rollout, Amgen management has been jolted by               the bumps in the Epogen market. Epogen sales, which               account for half of Amgen's total product sales, spurted               21% to more than $1 billion in 1996. This year, most               analysts agree, the growth will slow to around 10% to               13%.
                Medicare reimburses U.S. dialysis centers for practically               all of the Epogen given to the nation's 214,000 dialysis               patients. This summer, Amgen underestimated the impact               of a government policy change that effectively reduced               demand for Epogen at some dialysis centers.
                These centers also face the proposed 10% reduction in               reimbursements for Epogen treatments. If the Health Care               Financing Administration approves the cut, Amgen would               be under enormous pressure to lower the drug's price.
                Another threat to Epogen comes from the National Kidney               Foundation, which this month issued new               dialysis-treatment guidelines. Some believe the guidelines               will lead physicians to administer Epogen by injection               rather than intravenously. If that happens, it would               decrease demand for the drug because less of it is used in               injections.
                Amgen's Mr. Binder notes that the kidney foundation's               recommendations, came out in draft form a year ago, and               their effect "is really behind us."
                Not everyone agrees. "I think Epogen revenues will go               down 3%" next year -- even without a price cut, predicts               Albert Rauch, an Everen Securities analyst in Chicago.
                For Amgen and Mr. Binder, the search for the next               blockbuster weighs heavily. None of its 12 drugs in human               trials has washed out completely, but expectations for               some of them have been scaled back. One former hot               candidate, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, showed no               statistically significant advantage for people with               amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, better known as Lou               Gehrig's disease. |