SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (154689)11/18/2007 10:06:31 AM
From: Oral Roberts  Read Replies (3) of 225578
 
Well one inconvenient truth is that CO2 levels trail temperature by 3-600 years. So CO2 is not driving temperature according to Gores own chart. A better case could be made that temperature drives CO2 content using Al's own chart. And that could be because warmer oceans give off CO2 rather then absorb it as they do when they are cold. We also know that CO2 as percent of our atmosphere is very small and the amount of that that man contributes is very small. We are insignificant.

Also keep in mind we have been warmer in our history then we are now. Also keep in mind that the corrected data from NASA says that 99 is NOT the warmest year on record but rather is 3rd warmest with 2 of the 30's years being warmer. Al keeps quoting 99 as being the warmest which means either he is a moron or a liar with an agenda. Take your pick.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News