PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jlallen who wrote (766448)	11/19/2007 6:38:46 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) of 769670

Re: I don't see any "renege" He went back on the terms of his public challenge... then made up new pre-conditions that were never part of the original challenge. That's a renege to me. :-) Should be interesting to see where this goes now. I suggest THESE TWO POSSIBLE OPTIONS: 1) Stick to the terms of his ORIGINAL public challenge (in which T. Boone gets to decide all by himself whether the evidence that is submitted meets his own personal definition for 'sufficient proof' --- but must hear the evidence in public.) Or, 2) Toss all of that and go with the NEW, REVISED TERMS with the NUMEROUS PRECONDITIONS that he is now demanding --- but then give up the ability to be the sole arbiter of the question "has the challenge been won?", and turn it over to some neutral judge or arbiter that is mutually agreed to by both parties. Wanna bet that ole T. Boone continues to hide behind his press flacks, continues to skedaddle away from his public pledge... and NEVER does EITHER of the two possibilities listed above? That's how I'm betting....

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next