SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Starbucks SBUX
SBUX 89.97+1.2%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sturgeon who wrote (69)8/24/1996 8:43:00 PM
From: SONAR   of 148
 
rod...
i'll pass on the quiz because i have no clue about a lot of the things you are asking... i could go FFTT or TTTT or TTTF or or or...
even if all the fundamentals agree with you... fundamentals don't always work...
but again.... had i bought SBUX at 19 five months ago, i would have made 11 bucks (star bucks:) per share...
as to the insistance that it is like a pyramid scam... i'm not so knowledgeable, but starbucks does not sell franchises... or works like amway... does it?

but regardless... what were the fundamentals when netscape ipo'ed? did you call it a scam?

listen i have no problems with you or your analysis... i don't even own starbucks or netscape...
what i am learning is that all the fundamentals, curve analysis, etc. that i see posted do not guarantee returns such as sbux has provided its investors... i used own tltk... bought it under two, lucked out sold it near 4.75... there is a man on that thread (roger black i think is his name) who has the most incredible sharp mind and knows all abou stock stuff, and has on numerous occasions predicted tltk to get over the 10 hump.... nothing doing?

now i'm curious why you are so negative about sbux? 'cause sometimes you sound like a crusader... are you peet (of peet's coffee who was partner to sbux initiator) by any chance?
do you own sbux? are you into sbux puts? what's the deal? just curious

henry

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext