SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: E. T. who wrote (24238)11/27/2007 9:42:17 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
"You must be a black hater to suggest this country was not, at least in part, built with sweat and blood of many generations of people descended from Africa."

You must be Europhobe to deny that the majority of what made America great in the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries was the blood sweat and tears of European descended settlers. I don't have to hate anyone to not inflate their contribution. For whatever reason the culture of African Americans needed to break out of a closed society to release the innate greatness contained within the individuals. Today more descendents of African heritage seem to be making their mark on the economy than ever before.

It has been true throughout history that insolated civilizations stagnate and through trade and civilized exchange others have thrived.

I read a while back about a man who insisted that in every telephone job interview the applicant must be made to use the word ask. The story was written in such a way that I believed he used it to discriminate against a certain group. IS there something malformed in the mouth of African Americans that causes them to mispronounce it or do they choose to maintain a subculture that enables others to discriminate by simple methods?

"Peter's simplistic and naive view of how America came to be what it is today."

If you want a dissertation, I could accommodate you. I doubt you would be able to read it because it would cause you too much pain to face the reality of the compounded individual accomplishments and individual responsibility and the importance they had in America's success.

honesty, honor, integrity" reveals Peter's shallow reading of history.

Sorry I disagree with you that Clinton was a high water mark of historical accomplishment. Clinton was a low water mark of political expediency by those without character. History is filled with people who seemed to get ahead at the expense of honesty, honor and integrity; but that is an illusion. Ultimately men and women of honor most often overcame the scumbags in the long run.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News