SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Land Shark who wrote (109873)11/27/2007 9:52:25 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
Nope, it means the opposite. Sorry to disappoint you.

What's there to negotiate? Just get out!

That's what Demorats would do but then they want to lose.

Incidentally only the war criminals cite the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq as being a continuation of the Gulf War and associated UNSC resolutions. The original UNSC resolutions did NOT give the USA authorization to invade Iraq and occupy it. Nor did it give authorization for regime change.


I disagree. But the original resolutions are irrrelevant. They've been replaced by new UNSC resolutions authorizing our and our allies presence there now. Funny, that someone who speaks of UN resolutions in the past as being important wants us to shirk the present ones.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext