>I'm enjoying these negative posts, it is a good lesson in the what type of people invest in the market...
What makes it so hard to understand that investors have great hopes on their investment appreciating? Why is that such a unique concept to you? I wish, just like the next guy that QDRX would finally get it together, but my confidence with this management is quickly diminishing.
>Would like to sue quadrax but first him and his cronnies stir up a little discontent among the quadrax shareholders on this thread.
Me thinks QDRX can attract enough discontent on it's own <g!>. And to think that Mike is behind this 'big conspiracy' is a bit paranoid isn't it? Easy to distract attention and blame all of QRDX's problems on others. Successful operations come from within. Ever wonder how many naysayers would be around if this company finally got it's act together and the stcok actually began appreciating?
>There is no doubt that if TM doesn't sign a contract with this Co. in the near future-quadrax will be in dire straits.
Wow! you're starting to see the big picture? The point remains, Jim all but said in July that the TM contract was his pocket and he could not annouce until the TM marketing rollout came. With your inside info you keep touting, does your comment means there never was a contract and we are not waiting for the promotional kick off?
Secondly, you keep being asked to substantiate your 9/19 post #2761, to wit:
>In a week or so I will have some very good news for you loyal and frustrated shareholders...
I, and I am sure every person on this thread would very much appreciate you to finally answer this doggone question. Why have you persisted in avoiding this issue? You want to talk about credibility? Answer the darn question or admit there was nothing.
Regards,
-Scott |
