SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (360558)11/28/2007 4:45:32 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) of 1575354
 
Technically reunification was a one time event or close to it. The adjustments to that continue, but they've had 17 years to adjust. Not counting them when considering Europe's economic performance at this point doesn't make sense.

Also you haven't responded to my other point. Including Germany means you are including East Germany which had its productive capacity limited by socialism. That socialism was largely lifted, and East Germany had the opportunity to grow at a higher than average rate, which it did. So it might not exactly be reasonable (esp. after 17 years) to blame reunification for slower growth.

And even if reunification was 100% to blame for Germany growing slower than the rest of Europe, it would change the fact that Germany is indeed part of Europe. Smaller events happened in or to the US that reduced American economic growth.

At most you get "Europe has performed worse than the US, because of re-unification". You don't get "Europe has performed as well as the US", or "Europe did better than the US".
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News