Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ruffian who wrote (249939)	11/28/2007 5:02:33 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) of 281500

The terminology in the title is ironically and obviously so propagandized that it makes it hard to consider the article with any seriousness. Were you hoping to elicit sympathy for the 'embattled Savage?' His show IS a one sided attack on others and an extremist attack that harms innocents while doing nothing to terrorists but validate them, which is more harm than good. He represents what you claimed to stand against in the earlier article. He is an extremist spoiler that creates barriers, while attempting to in flame decent people of differing cultures who could otherwise live in peaceful coexistence. "Moslem group 'attacks' Michael Savage." You've got it backwards, Michael Savage's program is an extremist attack on innocent Muslims. It's like calling the kid who reports the playground bully or the neighborhood gangsters a 'snitch' who's causing trouble for the bully, making the bully a victim ... as if what the kid is doing is evil. I didn't actually read the article for content past the title, I skimmed it but not enough to form an opinion on whatever CAIR did. I doubt they were fairly represented in that yellow article.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next