SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE
SPY 683.21+0.2%4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pompsander who wrote (11690)11/30/2007 4:45:23 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) of 25737
 
No tin hats required. It just looks like Rudy (or someone with the power to place the expense) didn't want those trips evident in the regular security expense logs.

Here is my take on it. Rudy was the Mayor, Rudy is entitled to have security wherever he goes, whether it be in his home, his trip to the beach, or a dallyiance on the side. The issue here isnt the fact he had security, thats required. If one wishes to criticize Rudy, call a spade, a spade, he apparently was having an adulterous affair. If that bothers you try and find a male politician that hasnt. Sadly, women are attracted to POWER like bees to flowers. Dont try and make something up about his security expenses. jdn
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News