Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (250349)	12/4/2007 11:02:22 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) of 281500

"First, any argument that tries to use a regional phenomenon to disprove a global trend is dead in the water. No, of course not, they can only be used to PROVE a global trend, which is why Al Gore et al treat us regularly to photos of that West Antarctic ice sheet melting as PROOF of global warming." One isolated region hasn't been used to find trends. Greenland, Arctic, tropics, high mountain ranges, northern tundra, ocean temperatures are all included in discussions. "Al Gore et al treat us regularly to photos of that West Antarctic ice sheet melting as PROOF of global warming" should read ... "melting as MORE EVIDENCE"... "The real question is money and attention being finite, how much do you spend on an unproved theory?" You mean cold fusion or do you mean bioengineering or intelligent design? AGW is not considered an unproven theory, except by the ignoranti.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next