SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: estatemakr who wrote (8494)12/4/2007 1:20:18 PM
From: The Ox  Read Replies (1) of 33421
 
The average consumer who is currently in over their head, with an ARM that they should have never been in, does not possess your knowledge of the financial markets, and knows nothing of "margin", "leverage", etc........


Both sides in this equation are "at fault". JoeSixPack(JSP) should not have allowed himself to be put in an ARM at a time when interest rates were at or near record lows. Why did JSP agree to an ARM? Because the banks and the mortgage companies pointed JSP into these. Why? Because the banks and mortgage companies would make more and more money over time, as each rate reset occurred. Add in "teaser rates" and this situation becomes an even more dubious scam. To lay the blame solely at JSP is flat out wrong.

I have little to no sympathy for the banks and mortgage holders who may be required to turn some of these ARMs into fixed rate mortgages, which in reality, is where most of the JSPs should have been pointed.

In most cases, JSP should never have been given an ARM and, in most cases, the banks and the lenders clearly knew this was the situation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext