SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (18029)12/6/2007 12:44:23 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) of 36921
 
I won't vouch for the drawing you linked, but it does appear to make sense, that net energy comes in near the equator, while net energy is radiated back more near the poles. The earth is not flat, unlike that great French scientists who made an ass of himself assumed in his equations while trying to show that AGW couldn't possibly be true. LOL!. So we can assume you are not making that mistake. Excellent!

Unfortunately, as the poles loose their ice for more of the year, the little blue thingies on your graph get smaller, and the red thingy in the middle gets wider. Which is one of the issues scientists are concerned about with global warming. What point were you trying to misunderstand with your graph?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News