SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: E_K_S who wrote (29218)12/11/2007 8:18:33 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (2) of 78717
 
Yes, I agree: it's good to evaluate on several measures.

It's a philosophical thing too. I assume most people look for reasons to exclude stocks from purchase. That is, for any stock somebody comes across, it isn't a buy for them because maybe the person won't buy large caps, or won't buy any microcaps, or the dividend is too small, or the p/e is down, or there's too much debt, or analysts are issuing sell ratings or the psr is still too high, etc. etc. All supporting reasons for somebody to avoid making a purchase. Valid reasons too.

Obviously for anybody who looks at all the various stocks I am buying, my philosophy is going to be different. I am trying to find reasons to include stocks for a purchase, not exclude them.

So as regards DIS, it does not pass my requirement for either p/sales comparisons or for p/book measures. It did though in the past go 'round on the thread ('02-'03). However, on forward p/e -- acknowledging that basing purchases on forward estimated earnings is VERY dangerous -- I can include the stock now as a buy. Jmo of course. And it helps - confirms sort of - that people who use cash flows to make their buys, also say it's a value at current price.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext