Re: "In other words, you don't know what you're talking about?"
Sandi... your 'comment' doesn't make ANY SENSE on so many levels that I scarcely know where to begin.
But, let me try:
1) You said "you don't know what you're talking about?", but since I SPECIFICALLY SAID that I DID NOT LOOK AT your blind-link, and therefore I NEVER MADE ANY 'COMMENT' ABOUT THE SUBSTANCE OF THE LINK AT ALL, <GGG>, objectively any fool can see I NEVER "talked about" the link's subject --- whatever it was --- at all. :-)
So, it's more then a bit silly to pretend differently, Sandi.
Never happened. Never "talked about" your blind-link.
2) To reiterate the reasons why I don't click-through on blind-posted links, (which that I have explained several times previously, yet which still seem to provoke howls of outrage from folks who are either too lazy, or else have other possibly more childish reasons for not bothering to even mention what their supposedly 'important' blind-links are about):
I never watch *any* 'blind-posted links' (links without any explanation or introduction as to what the content is about), because I figure the odds are high that they are usually a complete waste of time, a diversion from the conversation, or worse.
If the poster is TOO LAZY to bother even with a one sentence introduction... them I'm sure not going to waste my time being led around like a bull with a ring in his nose. :-) |
