There's a couple of things everybody needs to know.
First, there has been testing going on as somebody speculated - since about mid-summer to be precise. BT's no fool, Why would they buy an untested technology? Well, it works. Like a charm. Did anybody call today and find out who's in the executive offices at Bohemia? Now, where do you think they all went...? All of them? Why? Figure it out. It's like the old EBS transmissions: "We now conclude this blackout: this was only a test".
Secondly, there's a lot of paranoia going on about MM's. SEC investigations. Insider information. Give me a break. I certainly haven't given you any "insider information" that was actionable. Nor have I told anybody to buy or sell or when to do so. Check my posts. No hard dates except my lamentable St. Therese prognostication, which was REALLY wrong. I don't patronize the intelligent people here. I'm pretty darn cryptic in my texts (remember Paul Revere?) as many of you have rightfully lamented. I'm not here to "hype" the stock (actually I've said some pretty nasty things about the company on this thread) nor am I here to disparage it (I've encouraged hope through some pretty gloomy periods that Rick has so kindly pointed out in the 10Q's). Some value my posts. Some don't. It's your choice. It makes no difference to me what you do. I post for sake of those that happen to find value in what I opine. I'm not an expert. So my ego doesn't require that I defend myself or my posts. That's not what this thread is for. Didn't I propose that volume would drop just before a big move precisely BECAUSE nobody wants to run afoul of the SEC, least of all the MM's?
Third, its true that today's activity is orchestrated. Anybody with a brain can see that. Is there news? NO. Is there stock movement? YES! Go figure. There's no OBJECTIVE reason for what we're seeing. But let me suggest something. I talked about a launch platform. A platform is built BEFORE the launch, right? It's not being built by "real" news, so who is building? Better yet, why? So they can flush out short position profits on another drop? Think that one through. If they're shorting, why have they collared this stock at .75 for weeks. Shorts make money on price movement, not stability. Let's deal with reality. Danny's burned through a LOT of money (and diluted our share positions horribly in the process) for what? A pipe dream technology? I don't think so... Others may differ.
Fourth, I promised information. But I think a few more days delay won't hurt. I have a hunch (and ONLY a hunch) that I'd be unduly pulling out the carpet on Danny's big party if I deliver right now. He's worked hard for this. I'll defer for a few more days and hope that my reason for doing so will become self evident to all: Danny's got the floor and the spotlight. Danny, howz about delivering the baby when you get back? Fair is fair.
Fifth: You know who you are: Read my lips: I'm not her. Never have been. Rick thinks so. Well, enough said, hmmm? Soon you'll all see how accurately he's called the play here. Then go figure the rest of his scorecard. Drop the accusations and suspicions. It's bad enough that poor manners and attitudes silenced her contributions here. I for one, wish she'd come back. But based on the continued atmosphere of "open discussion, genteel rebuttal and evenhandedness" on this thread, I can't blame her. Can you? It's why I myself left for a long time. Why would she return if this atmosphere hasn't changed. Illogical construct. Reject.
It's more intriguing (and machevellian) to consider the possibility that I might be the positive identity of a somewhat troubled personality on this thread. Haven't you noticed how we play off each other? Whichever way the stock goes, I'm right - both of me. Humility vs. ego. Optimism vs. pessimism. Mild vs. ranting. What a psycholigical pattern: I could be a very tragic schizoid personna. Any identity come to mind as to who my dark other half might be? Just watch the next few posts...
Ingrid (for the last 10 minutes at least) |
