A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (3363)	12/18/2007 2:21:20 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) of 42652

<<<I'm not actually suggesting no role for government at all, even if I am suggesting a smaller role.>>> I think it has been said before, size may not be the all important metric. Effectiveness and efficiency are what we are after. More bang for the buck is the preferred model. Let that be the last word(s)on this(lol). <<<What we do have are plenty of examples of how government involvement causes problems in this specific field,>>> I can see a lot of truth (or examples) in what you are saying here, but I can also see a lot of examples where government initiatives are, or would be, helpful. <<<and plenty of other examples that show how leaving the production of most goods and services to the private sector increases freedom and efficiency.>>> I can see where these examples exist, but I can also see examples where leaving the production of goods and services totally unregulated leads to corruption, inefficiency, and enslavement. You can probably make up a good list and chances are if I were as fanatical I could make up a list to match, if not exceed, your list.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next