SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (18678)12/19/2007 3:51:24 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) of 36921
 
The creationists typically do assert that evolution is incorrect.

You are correct in that you don't know much. When confronted with any level of detail, the favorite creationist response is to point out that the scientist can't provide much detail at all, but must revert to the theory framework of handwaving (those that survive are the fitest, we get what we get). This level of handwaving if FAR greater than any holes in climate science.

Hell, we can't even correctly place most species in a tree of life, let along explain all the interconnections and how they evolved. Talk about nonsense.

So once, again, could you detail why you accept evolution but not climate science? List the specifics in each which lead you to accept one, and doubt the other. That would be very enlightening.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News