SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only!
AMD 203.14-0.8%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Porter who wrote (1216)10/10/1997 6:33:00 PM
From: Richard Tuck   of 6843
 
I don't see much fragmentation, just segmentation. The difference is that Intel still dominates everything above the sub-$1000 consumer PCs segment. This bottom tier segment pops up every time the need for high-end PCs is not apparent. Usually, the bottom tier disappears quickly when something on the high-end becomes "essential."

The closest thing we've had to actual fragmentation in the 1990s is when the Pentium came out in 1993. At that time, competitors came out with the PowerPC, MIPS R4000, Alpha, and UltraSPARC (or SuperSPARC2 - I don't remember exactly). All of these processors could run Windows NT and several had advantages over the Pentium. Since NT didn't hit it big (at the time), the other processors did not end up chewing up Intel's market share.

Currently, we have a slew of information appliances, NetPCs/NCs, and sub-$1000 PCs fighting for the low-end buyer. That's where the fragementation is. Socket 7 is on its way out and no one is going to follow AMD into the wilderness on an upgraded Socket 7. Intel still sets the standards and as time goes on, expands its reach beyond the CPU and chipset to the I/O and power supplies.

Richard
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext