SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (3399)12/21/2007 3:00:18 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (2) of 42652
 
"it's a d..n good assumption "

Only in an alternate reality. In the real world it is a terrible assumption. People cannot legislate themselves free services without someone paying for it.

Incentive to become a doctor can suffer which will soon cause a decrease in the quality of doctors.

Funding for medical research would fall which would cause a dramatic decrease in the rate of medical innovation.

Entire countries can temporarily shift the research costs to a richer country that chooses to accept the burden for a time. Eventually the US will decline to pay for the whole world's benefit either because we choose not to or because our economy cannot afford to.

"If the US paid $5 for a loaf of bread and the rest of the world paid $2.50 for a loaf of read wouldn't you think something was out of whack? "

YES! and I would want to stop subsidizing the rest of the world.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext