A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (3417)	12/22/2007 8:59:30 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) of 42652

Great I would choose the parts that allow economic benefits to flow to health care providers and innovators. Economic benefits serve as incentive to motivate them to earn greater benefits by providing better service. Good start... universal care in no way precludes that. Government involvement dampens this effect to the detriment of all beneficiaries including but not limited to healthcare providers and suppliers as well as consumers. So you think we should cut out government funding of medical research? Now THAT would lead to much lower R&D and poorer results. In addition I would choose to eliminate the vampire effect of tort lawyers. Insurance companies suck much more "blood" from he system than lawyers.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next