The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (2396)	12/25/2007 11:09:47 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) of 3029

This issue seems so fundamental I don't see why it is even being discussed. To say that requiring an ID discriminates against one party over another is no more meaningful than to say that lack of ID discriminates against one party over another. I don't see why it is necessary to demonstrate that fraud has been perpetrated to justify a firm requirement for ID. If fraud is possible, then it should be prevented. Pure and simple. Besides, you don't have to go very far to find cases where fraud DID influence the outcome of an election. Dead people casting ballots; more ballots cast than registered voters, etc. What more is there to know?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next