SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Koligman who wrote (3498)12/26/2007 4:29:40 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
In today's system, how can the average person even compare or know how one insurance company will be better at accepting their claims than another

You read the policy. It will say what it pays for and what it doesn't. If it says it doesn't pay for experimental treatment, for example, then it doesn't.

Perhaps your real question is how do you find a company that will break the rules for you when you need something extra. I think it's fair to assume that none of them will.

IMO anyone with any 'health history' will not even look at this because they will be afraid of rejection if they drop current coverage, so they are 'stuck'.

People in high risk categories are always at a disadvantage in a system with an insurance paradigm. That's the way it is, by definition. Go get yourself a dozen speeding tickets and then look for car insurance if you don't understand that precept. The only way around that is a single insurance pool, which really isn't "insurance" anymore but socialized medicine. I can understand why people in that situation or afraid of falling into that situation want socialized medicine. It suboptimizes the system in their favor. Whether or not it's the smart approach overall is another matter.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext