Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (252576)	12/29/2007 9:39:28 AM
From: c.hinton	Read Replies (2) of 281500

please dont make yourself look more the fool.......you have repeatedly redefined original statement (Throughout history, the scientific establishment often has had to be dragged kicking and screaming into paradigm change. It was true in Galileo's time) ,yet continue to claim that original statement is correct. you once admitted you had trouble admitting you were wrong......take heed of your own self proclaimed weakness and admit you made a mistake in the wording of your original ill thought out attack. en.wikipedia.org you will see that "scholarly" is a way of presenting facts....IE.he presented his thesis in a scholarly manner.....he did his reasearch in a scholarly fashion..... -------------- now lets ask ourselves which statements are more likely to be the most appropriate. nasa is well known for its scholarly reaserch.... nasa is well known for its scientific reaserch. -------- mit is well known for its scholarly reaserch..... mit is well known for its scientific reaserch... -------- and why is it scientific america is not called scholastic american? pss please notice how you did not contest the use of "the scientific establishment"by dithers yet you now denie it ever existed

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next