PIG Roast. Putting Pork Barrel spending in it's place Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PIG Roast. Putting Pork Barrel spending in it's place

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: Tadsamillionaire	12/29/2007 3:46:54 PM
	of 26

What percentage of the national spending is pork? About 1 percent. and that is still too much Pork-barrel spending is funding allocated for legislators' pet projects, often without public hearings or a request from the president. Citizens Against Government Waste, an anti-pork watchdog group, estimated that pork projects cost $29 billion in 2006. (CAGW defines "pork" as "a line-item in an appropriations bill that designates tax dollars for a specific purpose in circumvention of established budgetary procedures.") The Office of Management and Budget's historical tables show a federal outlay of $2.66 trillion that year, so pork would represent 1.1 percent of the total spending. In 2005, CAGW identified 13,997 projects costing $27.3 billion that met its definition of pork spending; as in 2006, that was about 1.1 percent of total spending. Most pork spending comes in the form of "earmarks," which are items inserted in federal spending bills at the specific request of a House or Senate member. For 2005, the OMB offered a tally of 13,492 "earmarks" costing $18.9 billion out of $2.47 trillion in outlays, or about 0.77 percent of total federal spending. But earmarks aren't the only form of pork. For example, CAGW counts as pork any spending project that isn't requested by the administration and also isn't awarded through competition. Hundreds of spending items meet CAGW's definition even though they are not earmarks. – Jess Henig Sources Citizens Against Government Waste. "2006 Pig Book." Accessed 21 Dec. 2007. Citizens Against Government Waste. "2005 Pig Book." Accessed 21 Dec. 2007. Office of Management and Budget. "Historical Tables." Accessed 21 Dec. 2007. Office of Management and Budget. "Earmarks in 2005 Appropriations Bills." 10 July 2007.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next