Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.80

+0.3%

Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mindykoeppel who wrote (72828)	1/1/2008 8:51:59 AM
From: scratchmyback	Read Replies (1) of 196851

Does this mean that Qualcomm would have to pay the royalty only from the price of the chip, not from the price of the phone? How big a portion of the phones ASP would the price of the chip be? >>The court set royalty fees of 6 percent and 4.5 percent for two infringing technologies used on the EVDO chips but did not set a fee for the walkie-talkie technology. The fees are taken from sales revenue that Qualcomm makes when it sells a chip with the Broadcom technology. Qualcomm would have to pay more than 10.5 percent of revenues for some chips because they violate all three patents, Rosmann said. Others violate one or two.>> signonsandiego.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next