Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 175.32

+0.3%

Dec 8 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Carragher who wrote (72945)	1/2/2008 11:20:25 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (1) of 196863

brcm and nok could be hurt real bad for frivolous suits if proven A frivolous suit is one having no basis in law or in fact. The decisions so far show that both the law and the facts are still in question. Therefore, if there is ANY basis for a suit, the law allows it to go forward. A better possibility is a lawsuit charging interference with business by making false or misleading accusations that resulted in customers switching to a different supplier or product altogether because of fears about the QCOM products or IP. The real problem here is the conduct of the litigation by QUALCOMM's supposedly expert legal team. Their actions, or lack thereof, destroyed credibility, damaging the company and its shareholders. I'd like to see a big malpractice suit against the lawyers who screwed up, but the problem here is that we don't know whether anyone at QUALCOMM misled the lawyers. Art

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next