Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 169.39

+0.8%

10:57 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: manalagi who wrote (72920)	1/2/2008 5:16:11 PM
From: Rich Bloem	Read Replies (2) of 196787

When QCOM made the design someone else owned the patent and QCOM should have known that, and if it did, QCOM had infringed at that time. Mana, I disagree. There is no doubt in my mind that when a company decides to design and build something in this nebulous technology environment we are in, they do so knowing there are probably many many patents that they are (or will) stepping on. They also know that if they do step on somebody's protected technology then that company may or may not ring their door. If they do, then they can address the possibly infringement and hopefully arrive at a mutually agreeable position. There is no other way to do it imo. It would be impossible to search, analyze and make a determination on thousands and thousands of patents. If a company took this approach their product would never get off the drawing board. Much easier to build in the cost of paying X amount of unknown license fees into the product and wait for the door to ring. After all it just might not ring and if it does we can talk about it for a year or two.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next