Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.17

-0.5%

11:17 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pheilman_ who wrote (73014)	1/2/2008 9:30:23 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) of 196826

Avg Power: 1 Watt Standby time: 10.5 hrs I don't think these numbers are acceptable for portable applications, the device must last one day between charging. But, hey, good look with that marketing. I agree, unlike PC's, the key performance criteria for mobile solutions is going to be MHz/watt rather than MHz/$. Intel is working hard on this, but their first generation of UMPC processors were power hogs so they have quite a bit of work to do. Perhaps the ARM architecture provides an inherent advantage over the x86 architecture? I know as a general rule, I'd rather bet on the low-end architecture than is working up the performance curve (ARM) than the top-heavy architecture trying to reduce power (x86). Of course, the proof will be in the devices. If Q's customers can announce some devices with battery life specs that dramatically outperform the competition, it will definitely get noticed by the gadget blogs. I'm crossing my fingers that will happen at CES. Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next