SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (3556)1/3/2008 10:53:43 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) of 42652
 
Hopping to the other side for a moment, I was on the scene, long ago and far away, for two genuine emergency patients who, at the time, made this law necessary.

My recollection is that, before that law, a person with the means to pay who might be, for example, out jogging without ID and suffer a injury that left him unable to communicate his ability to pay would risk being denied treatment. Seems to me it's a good law. I know I felt safer when they enacted it.

Bad law.

Why do you say that. Seems to me that the answer would be to send the skinned knees elsewhere while treating all the real emergencies. Turn away from the emergency room the non emergencies rather than turning away the uninsured.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext