Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (20072)	1/5/2008 9:54:57 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Read Replies (1) of 224649

Dem debate: Obama says Bush Adm has not locked down nuclear weapons in the world. huh? Does he want us to invade Pakistan, etc?? Edwards: If he knew where Osama was he'd go get him. Wow! brilliant strategy. "If the terrorist had a nuclear weapon they could use it against America."..what a gift for stating the obvious. Lead a long-range initiative to rid the world of nuclear weapons. Richardson: He would ask Musharraf to step aside because we have the "leverage" to do that. They have a provision for a "caretaker gov" in Pakistan. Thought the Dems didn't want the US interfering with other nations??..or is it only when there's a Repub Pres that we mustn't interfere? This really is kindergarten time. Her Majesty speaks: "we tried to target Osama 10yrs ago but he was not taken out at the time"..that was the $1M missile hitting the camel in the $10 tent incident. Inherent paranoia re India in the area so it's a delicate situation. She learned since last wk that these are parliamentary elections in Pakistan..Musharraf's not on the ballot. The Hillster wants to "repair" the failed policies of the Bush Adm. Richardson: "a president has to act" (he forgot to mention unless it's a Repub) Every action GW has taken they've criticized. Obama: GW went after those who didn't attack the US. "We must get Pakistan's agreement before we act, but we mustn't hesitate before we act." hmmmm. classic straddle. He's getting Kerryesque. Edwards: "If someone has attacked us with a nuclear weapon it means they have nuclear technology." haha, really? "It's enormously important for a pres to act strongly but in a calming way." hmmm, didn't they ridicule GW for sitting calmly continuing to read rather than upset a class of toddlers on Sept 11?..they're such illogical hypocrites. Hillster: There should be a person to martial our resources for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. Every state in the world must know we will retaliate if any nation has a safe haven for those who would attack the US with a nuclear weapon. (don't they slam GW whenever he gets tough or threatens other nations?--evidently it's always different if the Dems are making the threats. In reality, when they actually are in the WH, they habitually hesitate to take action) Obama & Hill squabbling about their second-rate healthcare plans. Edwards says he & Obama are powerful voices for change...he's defending Obama after he was attacked by Hillary. Edwards is applying for Obama's VP. Mr O had a knowing smile on his lips. Richardson says he's been in hostage negotiations that have been more civil than this. He really is their only adult candidate, but still a lightweight when it comes to POTUS. Change, change, change..say it often enough and it puts you to sleep. Hillary glaring at Obama. Gibson: YOU ALL OPPOSED the SURGE and there are signs it is working--this should be good. Hill called on the rug to explain "willful suspension of disbelief" She says the idea was to create time for political reconciliation. "It's time to bring out troops home." within 60days she says she would withdraw. Who needs victory?..not the Dems. Richardson on the grab defeat from the jaws of victory bandwagon. "Until we end this war, we can't talk about issues at home. Can't have CHANGE until the troops come home." Obama trying to take the floor. "It was a mistake to go in from the start." "Lost lives and not safer as a consequence"....really? have we been attacked by terrorists since 9/11?..No--they've been too busy fighting US troops in Iraq. OY! He mentions stress on American taxpayers. (eliminating earmarks would help in that regard. They promised but renegged on it.) Richardson pandering...he says the congress' dysfunctional relationship with the pres will end when the troops come home. Mrs Clinton: "it's complicated, so it must be done right." (she's hanging out with Edwards too much) That's all I can stands..I can't stands no more!....Popeye

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next