SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (99584)1/10/2008 2:58:56 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (2) of 306849
 
Yes...but if you had to scale solar to replace the capacity of coal, the costs of materials would skyrocket. Thus your're not realistically comparing the two.

Undoubtedly solar thermoelectric will be much more widely used, (in fact there is a large project in Nevada near Vegas already operating and a "large" one in AZ on the drawing board (by large I mean 100 mW, still small by power plant standards, but large for solar), but there are still some technical issues remaining.

democraticunderground.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News