SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (366550)1/12/2008 12:34:12 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (3) of 1571412
 
Hi Ten,

I've looked at all the candidates and listened to many speeches from each. I think Obama is one of the best candidates when it comes to getting us to energy independence. That goal is one of his top priorities. He wants to embark us on a "Manhattan Project" (his words) and spend $150B over the next 10 years on incentives, research, tax breaks, you name it, to help us achieve that goal.

The only other candidate that claims that energy independence is a "moral imperative" is Huckabee. However, Obama is electable. Huckabee is not. And Huckabee is too much of an evangelical for me. I'm sick of evangelicals and their Creationist b.s. It's time for a more scientific and rational Presidency. It's also time for someone who knows how to put spirit and unity back into Americans. Obama is the best man for that job.

So I'm decided. This is how I'll vote. I'll vote for Obama if he wins the Democratic nomination. If Hillary wins, I will vote for a Republican, preferably Huckabee, Guliani, or McCain, in that order. If Hillary races against Thompson or Romney, I will vote for a 3rd Party, maybe Bloomberg. If there is no 3rd party, then I will abstain.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext