rushlong, I do not have to guess, I know that wso2 ( not w2so as you have spelled it ) seems to be a respectable poster on this board and has made many valuable contributions to it and to other boards as well. I have found his letters helpfull to me and my research. I CAREFULLY READ posts. Its a part of good DD. I did not call into question his communication with ACII or his knowledge of financial reports as you emply. My responce to wso2 was only in mutual anticipation of the financial reports due soon. As part of my post to wso2 I referenced a post of mine, to another board, to a different poster, at another time, JAN 8th,2007. If you had read carefully you would have noticed that, you did not. To that poster (not wso2) I, in kind, offered a thumbnail sketch of previous financial reports & about how I saw ACII at that time. I of course encouraged him (not wso2) to look into ACII further, its website and certainly DD as my recommendation and disclaimer. ( by the way he wrote me back & has since has become an invester in ACII ). From this I know my letter has been of some benefit to ACCI and the community in general. Letters such like yours to me are not. Maybe only exceptionally enjoyed in a limited way among your group. I encourage you to read posts more carefully, reply responsively. That should be a big part of YOUR DD, to the benefit of the board and the ACII community. ...that is what I know.
PS: 1. regarding communication with ACII, please see my correspondence as such, in my reply post to you to learn timing of financial reports. Beneficial factual information, not careless banter.
PS: 2. I appreciate that you may be a long time contributer but personally it means nothing to me how long, small or large an invester/poster is so long as they contribute good purpose with all due respect. I have not seen that from you. For now, this waste of time ends.
boundtb |
